This assessment ensures that students at the partner institution receive support that is comparable to what they would receive at the home institution, aligning with institutional standards for student well-being.
Important: Attach relevant information on the required standards for each service area, including expected staffing levels, service hours, and resources. Include guidelines for assessing quality, accessibility, and service consistency across campuses. It is not recommended to use this prompt without attached data.
Basic Prompt
Prompt Development:
Add More Relevant Data: Attach institutional standards for each service, including quality benchmarks and accessibility guidelines. Provide data on the home institution’s staffing levels, service hours, and student satisfaction metrics to guide fair comparisons. Include checklists for evaluating inclusivity and specific action steps for service improvement.
Define Service Availability Metrics: Include prompts for evaluating service availability based on factors such as staffing levels, hours of operation, and ease of access, ensuring each service meets minimum accessibility standards.
Add Quality Assessment Criteria for Each Service: Develop prompts to assess the quality of counseling, career support, and health services, including criteria like student satisfaction, responsiveness, and effectiveness of support provided.
Incorporate Accessibility and Inclusivity Standards: Include guidelines for evaluating whether services are accessible to all students, regardless of physical abilities, language proficiency, or cultural background, to ensure inclusive support.
Provide Comparison Fields for Service Consistency: Add a section for comparing the services offered at [partner-institution] with those at [institution-name], helping to identify any gaps and areas for improvement to achieve consistent support standards.Include a Recommendations and Action Items Section: Suggest a section for recording recommended actions if any service areas require enhancement, providing clear steps to improve availability, quality, or accessibility.
Developed Prompt:
Refinements:
After generating your response, you may need to ask questions and refine the response to ensure more accurate and relevant results. Refining helps the AI better understand your specific needs, leading to more practical and tailored outputs. Here’s how you can refine the template:
• Standardize Comparison Format for Consistency: Use a standardized format for direct comparisons between services at the home and partner institutions. → Example: “Can you include a comparison table format to highlight differences in service availability and quality?”
• Provide Example Action Steps for Improvement: Add sample action items to guide improvements in services that may fall short of institutional standards. → Example: “Can you add examples of actions, such as expanding service hours or adding bilingual staff, to improve accessibility?”• Include a Summary Section for Major Findings: Add a summary table that captures key findings and priority areas for immediate improvement. → Example: “Can you provide a summary section highlighting major gaps and recommended enhancements?”
Register your interest to secure your spot on our upcoming course on Fundamentals for Genreative AI in International Higher Education. We'll let you know as soon as it's ready!
Student Services Availability for TNE Partner
This assessment ensures that students at the partner institution receive support that is comparable to what they would receive at the home institution, aligning with institutional standards for student well-being.
Basic Prompt
Prompt Development:
Define Service Availability Metrics: Include prompts for evaluating service availability based on factors such as staffing levels, hours of operation, and ease of access, ensuring each service meets minimum accessibility standards.
Add Quality Assessment Criteria for Each Service: Develop prompts to assess the quality of counseling, career support, and health services, including criteria like student satisfaction, responsiveness, and effectiveness of support provided.
Incorporate Accessibility and Inclusivity Standards: Include guidelines for evaluating whether services are accessible to all students, regardless of physical abilities, language proficiency, or cultural background, to ensure inclusive support.
Provide Comparison Fields for Service Consistency: Add a section for comparing the services offered at [partner-institution] with those at [institution-name], helping to identify any gaps and areas for improvement to achieve consistent support standards.Include a Recommendations and Action Items Section: Suggest a section for recording recommended actions if any service areas require enhancement, providing clear steps to improve availability, quality, or accessibility.
Developed Prompt:
Refinements:
• Standardize Comparison Format for Consistency: Use a standardized format for direct comparisons between services at the home and partner institutions.
→ Example: “Can you include a comparison table format to highlight differences in service availability and quality?”
• Provide Example Action Steps for Improvement: Add sample action items to guide improvements in services that may fall short of institutional standards.
→ Example: “Can you add examples of actions, such as expanding service hours or adding bilingual staff, to improve accessibility?”• Include a Summary Section for Major Findings: Add a summary table that captures key findings and priority areas for immediate improvement.
→ Example: “Can you provide a summary section highlighting major gaps and recommended enhancements?”